<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://geeks.ms/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Percy Reyes's Technical Blog on SQL Server</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/default.aspx</link><description>About Database Management, Performance Tuning, High Availability, SQL Server Internals &amp;amp; Troubleshooting. 
</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>Avoid changing default ANSI database options</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2013/01/14/208268.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:11:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:208268</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=208268</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=208268</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2013/01/14/208268.aspx#comments</comments><description>There are many situations where you may need to turn off a ANSI database option in order to solve an error like this Msg 8152, Level 16, State 14, Line 5 String or binary data would be truncated. I know most people choose to configure ANSI_WARNINGS on OFF as final solution, however this is not so recommendable because can cause RECOMPILATION for each stored procedure where it was turned off. You should avoid your stored procedures are recompiled wherever possible in order not to impact negatively...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2013/01/14/208268.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=208268" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/ANSI/default.aspx">ANSI</category><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/RECOMPILATION/default.aspx">RECOMPILATION</category></item><item><title>Could not obtain information about Windows NT group/user</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2013/01/14/208266.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:48:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:208266</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=208266</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=208266</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2013/01/14/208266.aspx#comments</comments><description>Sometimes you will need to use Extended Procedures in SQL Server to get information about any domain accounts and you may see this error is raised at execution time: Error: 15404, State: 19. Could not obtain information about Windows NT group/user &amp;#39;MyDomain\MyAccount&amp;#39;, error code 0x5. In order to solve this error your Network Administrator has to do a correct configuration (for the account you are logged within SQL Server) in the Active Directory by following these steps: Enable &amp;#39;Allowed...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2013/01/14/208266.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=208266" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx">Security</category><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/ExtendedProcedure/default.aspx">ExtendedProcedure</category></item><item><title>Bug en SQL Server 2008 R2 el cual genera que el grid view de SSMS muestre líneas rojas</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2011/03/05/189991.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 04:52:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:189991</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=189991</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=189991</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2011/03/05/189991.aspx#comments</comments><description>En este post explícitamente indicaré cómo resolver un problema en SQL Server que ya ha sido reportado como un bug del producto el cual se debe a un error de casting de datos de tipo DATETIMEOFFSET hacia SQL_VARIANT . El mensaje típico del error es el siguiente: An error occurred while executing batch. Error message is: Input string was not in a correct format. El tipo de dato SQL_VARIANT en realidad no puede almacenar datos de tipo DATETIMEOFFSET, tomemos esto como una de sus restricciones. Bien...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2011/03/05/189991.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=189991" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category></item><item><title>SQL11 (Denali): OFFSET y FETCH (Nuevas opciones para ORDER BY)</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/16/184908.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:184908</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=184908</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=184908</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/16/184908.aspx#comments</comments><description>En Denali se ha mejorado la funcionalidad de la cl&amp;aacute;usula ORDER BY agregando m&amp;aacute;s argumentos en busca de dar soluci&amp;oacute;n a escenarios espec&amp;iacute;ficos como es el caso del paginado, es decir, simular la lectura por partes de los resultados de una consulta, tema que se pod&amp;iacute;a realizar en versiones previas combinando TOP, OVER y ORDER BY, sin embargo, el rendimiento de esta soluci&amp;oacute;n es pobre comparado a lo que se puede conseguir con OFFSET y FETCH . En OFFSET se debe indicar...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/16/184908.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=184908" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category></item><item><title>SQL11 (Denali): No soporta bases de datos de SQL Server 2000</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/16/184907.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 02:31:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:184907</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=184907</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=184907</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/16/184907.aspx#comments</comments><description>Dentro de la lista de compatibilidades que ”supuestamente soporta” Denali se encuentra SQL Server 2000 (80), sin embargo, si se desea restaurar un backup de una base de datos con dicha compatibilidad será imposible hasta el momento, y no creo que cambie esto, pienso que Denali en RTM tampoco soportará compatibilidad 80, puesto hasta donde sé, cada versión de SQL Server sólo soporta dos versiones anteriores, en este caso, sería compatibilidad 90 (para SQL Server 2005)&amp;#160; y 100 (para SQL Server...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/16/184907.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=184907" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category></item><item><title>SQL11 (Denali): Nuevo Objeto SEQUENCE</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/15/184840.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:56:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:184840</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=184840</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=184840</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/15/184840.aspx#comments</comments><description>En el CTP1 Denali tenemos un nuevo objeto muy interesante denominado SEQUENCE para manejar secuencia de números entre el rango de -2^31 – 1 hasta 2^31 –1. SEQUENCE soluciona muchos problemas relacionado al uso de la propiedad IDENTITY, no está amarrado a la columna y se puede usar para varias columnas en diferentes tablas. También es útil como alternativa limitada a ROW_NUMBER. Su uso es bien sencillo, práctico y flexible, ofrece mejor performance que IDENTITY, no se puede usar dentro de funciones...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/11/15/184840.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=184840" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/tags/SQL+Server+2012/default.aspx">SQL Server 2012</category></item><item><title>Prox. Eventos: 24 Horas PASS-LATAM + SQL Server 2008 R2 Event Launch! (19, 20, 23 Oct.)</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/10/18/183460.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:16:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:183460</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=183460</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=183460</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/10/18/183460.aspx#comments</comments><description>Reaparecezco nuevamente despu&amp;eacute;s de buen tiempo para invitarles a 2 eventos de importancia para personas interesadas en t&amp;oacute;picos de SQL Server en sus diversas variedades y sabores. El primer evento es el conocido como &amp;quot;24 Horas PASS-LATAM&amp;quot; , evento online repartido en dos d&amp;iacute;as(19 y 20 Oct.) donde se garantiza 24 horas de diversi&amp;oacute;n total con SQL server. M&amp;aacute;s informaci&amp;oacute;n: http://sqlpass-latam.org , reg&amp;iacute;strense!. El otro evento ser&amp;aacute; el s&amp;aacute;bado...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/10/18/183460.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=183460" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Clinic 10259: SQL Server 2008: Database Infrastructure and Scalability</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/20/175187.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:16:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:175187</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=175187</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=175187</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/20/175187.aspx#comments</comments><description>En Microsoft Learning han liberado un Clinic de SQL Server 2008 totalmente gratis. El enlace es: https://www.microsoftelearning.com/eLearning/courseDetail.aspx?courseId=137158&amp;amp;tab=overview &amp;#160; Los temas cubiertos son los siguientes: Availability, Security, Scalability, and Resource Management and Troubleshooting Enhancements Policy-Based Management and Multi-Server Administration Performance Data Collection Management Implications of New Features Espero puedan aprovecharlo!...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/20/175187.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=175187" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dedicated administrator connections are not supported. (ObjectExplorer)</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/16/174865.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:174865</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=174865</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=174865</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/16/174865.aspx#comments</comments><description>Cada vez son m&amp;aacute;s los art&amp;iacute;culos que indican que no se puede establecer una conexi&amp;oacute;n DAC (Dedicated Administrator Connection) usando el panel Object Browser en SSMS(SQL Server Management Studio) tanto en SQL Server. Esta afirmaci&amp;oacute;n es cierta, el object explorer no soporta conexiones usando DAC, no hay vuelta que darle en este punto, sin embargo, esto puede llevar a muchos a concluir que SSMS es inutilizable con DAC. Cannot connect to admin:servername. Dedicated administrator...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/16/174865.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=174865" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Geo-Replication Performance Gains with Microsoft SQL Server 2008 Running on Windows Server 2008</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/14/174620.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 04:47:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:174620</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=174620</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=174620</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/14/174620.aspx#comments</comments><description>MSCOM Ops Team ha realizado un tremendo y excelente trabajo de testing de la performance de ambientes de replicación implementados en SQL Server 2005 on Windows Server 2003 y SQL Server 2008 on Windows Server 2008, una comparativa que aclara los beneficios conseguidos por SQL Server 2008 gracias a las mejoras en las pilas TCP/IP de Windows Server 2008 (Receive Window Autotuning, Send Buffer Scaling y Compound TCP) , en el cual concluyó lo siguiente: &amp;quot;… the team discovered that SQL Server 2008...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/04/14/174620.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=174620" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Charla de Optimización y Tuning de SQL Server este sábado 20 feb. en el salón de Microsoft Perú</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/02/16/167558.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 02:28:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:167558</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=167558</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=167558</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/02/16/167558.aspx#comments</comments><description>Extiendo la invitación a un evento importante que se llevará acabo este 20 febrero en el salón de Microsoft Perú. “Técnicas de Optimización y Tuning de SQL Server” será la charla que tendré que gusto de compartir, espero verlos!. Charlas: Comunicación en aplicaciones .NET con Microsoft Office Communicator 2007 R2 WCF y WPF... juntos pero no revueltos Técnicas de optimización y tuning de SQL Server Fecha: Sábado 20 de febrero Lugar: Microsoft Perú Dirección: Av. Victor Andrés Belaunde #147 San Isidro...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/02/16/167558.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=167558" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>MSSQL_ENG003165: An error was encountered while replication was being restored/removed. The database has been left offline</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/09/164675.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:164675</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=164675</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=164675</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/09/164675.aspx#comments</comments><description>La restauraci&amp;oacute;n de un backup de una base de datos replicada sin usar la opci&amp;oacute;n KEEP_REPLICATION a un servidor con metadata diferente de replicaci&amp;oacute;n implica trabajos adicionales y posteriores a la ejecuci&amp;oacute;n del RESTORE DATABASE como eliminaci&amp;oacute;n de metadata diferente de replicaci&amp;oacute;n, eliminaci&amp;oacute;n de triggers como por ejemplo tr_MStran_alterschemaonly, tr_MStran_altertable, tr_MStran_altertrigger y tr_MStran_alterview (creadas para validar alteraciones...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/09/164675.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=164675" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Tempdb Integrity Check: DBCC could not obtain a lock on object “id” because the lock request timeout period was exceeded.</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/06/164446.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:164446</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=164446</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=164446</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/06/164446.aspx#comments</comments><description>Cuando se ejecuta los comandos DBCC CHECKDB , DBCC CHECKALLOC , DBCC CHECKCATALOG , DBCC CHECKTABLE y DBCC CHECKFILEGROUP se creará previamente una instantánea de la base de datos y sobre esta se realizará la comprobación lógica y física de los objetos. SQL Server asegura que esta instantánea sea coherente y luego de usarla la elimina. Con esta estrategia de evitará problemas de bloqueos y operaciones concurrentes cuando esté ejecutándose uno de los comandos anteriores. En el caso que SQL Server...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/06/164446.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=164446" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Petición de SQL Server 2005 SP4 y SQL Server 2008 SP2 …. Not coming soon?</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/04/164273.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 19:28:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:164273</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=164273</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=164273</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/04/164273.aspx#comments</comments><description>Considero que la realidad pura y dura es que los Cumulative Updates y hotfixes deben ser usados para solucionar problemas puntuales pero al realizar esta actividad el riesgo es alto, debido a esto las empresas no suelen usarlos a pesar de tener problemas, no hay mucha confianza, requiere bastante testing y tienden a ser inestables. El tema es que ha pasado más de un año y Microsoft aún no ha liberado el SP4 para SQL Server 2005 ni el SP2 para SQL Server 2008 , y existen problemas críticos que exigen...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2010/01/04/164273.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=164273" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server Bug: A floating point exception occurred in the user process. Current transaction is canceled</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/30/163957.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:08:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:163957</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=163957</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=163957</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/30/163957.aspx#comments</comments><description>Hoy en el trabajo un usuario reportó un error que se disparaba en su aplicativo que corre sobre SQL Server 2000 SP3a . El error es de aquellos que en cierto modo ya estaba desesperando a los chicos de soporte de aplicaciones, y motivos han de tener pues cuando me escalaron el tema verifiqué que se trataba de un bug en SQL Server 2000 . El mensaje de error es el siguiente (seguido de código T-SQL de UPDATE con filtros usando subconsultas el cual no indico por confidencialidad): Server: Msg 3628, Level...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/30/163957.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=163957" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Collations en SQL Server, ¿Es importante?, ¿Cuán importante es?</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/29/163896.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:163896</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>12</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=163896</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=163896</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/29/163896.aspx#comments</comments><description>Hace unos d&amp;iacute;as me preguntaban al respecto: Collation en SQL Server, &amp;iquest;Es importante? o &amp;iquest;Cu&amp;aacute;n importante es?, bueno, despu&amp;eacute;s de haberle explicado de manera general decid&amp;iacute; compartir algo m&amp;aacute;s con todo aquel interesadoa trav&amp;eacute;s de este post. El collation (intercalaci&amp;oacute;n) es una propiedad que gobierna/define los estilos de ordenaci&amp;oacute;n, comparaci&amp;oacute;n de texto y la forma como se almacena y leen los datos de las p&amp;aacute;ginas. El collation...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/29/163896.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=163896" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>¿Collations obsoletos en SQL Server 2008? o simplemente depreciados?</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/28/163853.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:163853</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=163853</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=163853</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/28/163853.aspx#comments</comments><description>No es novedad que en SQL Server 2008 han quedado obsoletas algunos collations lo que en teor&amp;iacute;a significa que ya no deber&amp;iacute;an existir en dicha versi&amp;oacute;n pero que para Microsoft no necesariamente tiene porque ser as&amp;iacute;. Estos collations obsoletos son Hindi_CI_AS, Macedonian_CI_AS, Lithuanian_Classic_CI_AS, Cyrillic_90_CI_AS, Azeri_Latin_90_CI_AS, SQL_ALTDiction_CP1253_CS_AS, Korean_Wansung_Unicode y Cyrillic_90_CI_AS. En la pr&amp;aacute;ctica he identificado que la mayor parte de...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/28/163853.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=163853" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 R2: Application and Multi-server Management: Utility Control Point (UCP) , Data-Tier Application(DAC)</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/18/162970.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 04:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:162970</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=162970</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=162970</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/18/162970.aspx#comments</comments><description>Con Application and Multi-server Management Microsoft tiene planeado brindar funcionalidades para ayudar a las organizaciones a administrar y gestionar ambientes SQL Server m&amp;aacute;s eficiente y productivamente lo cual permitir&amp;aacute; escalar y controlar con mayor visibilidad n-servidores de bases de datos con respecto a utilizaci&amp;oacute;n de recursos, diagn&amp;oacute;stico proactivo de issues de performance, monitoreo de la salud de las bases de datos, etc. Todo debe llevar a reducir costos en administraci&amp;oacute;n...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/18/162970.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=162970" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server Event: Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 Application and Multi-Server Management</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/18/162957.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:19:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:162957</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=162957</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=162957</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/18/162957.aspx#comments</comments><description>El día de mañana sábado 19 diciembre a partir de las 15:30 p.m. se llevará acabo un evento orientado a destripar ciertas nuevas funcionalidades que nos trae el&amp;#160; CTP november de SQL Sever 2008 R2. El lugar es la Universidad Ricardo Palma (Av. Benavides 5440 – Santiago de Surco, Lima - Perú) y los temas a tratarse serán: “Aplicando Reporting Services con Microsoft Dynamics”&amp;#160; - Juan Rafael “Gemini: Self-Service Business Intelligence con SQL Server 2008 R2 y Office 2010” – Jorge Ojeda “Microsoft...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/12/18/162957.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=162957" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 R2 November CTP with Master Data Services</title><link>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/11/09/160210.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2a2e7ade-7474-448b-9de5-1515d8bb7d1b:160210</guid><dc:creator>Percy Reyes</dc:creator><slash:comments>5</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/rsscomments.aspx?PostID=160210</wfw:commentRss><wfw:comment xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/commentapi.aspx?PostID=160210</wfw:comment><comments>http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/11/09/160210.aspx#comments</comments><description>Ya se puede ir descargando SQL Server 2008 R2 November CTP con Master Data Services: http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/R2Downloads.aspx , por ahora s&amp;oacute;lo est&amp;aacute; disponible para descarga v&amp;iacute;a subcripci&amp;oacute;n TechNet o MSDN, y a partir del 11 nov para libre descarga. Comparto recursos para informaci&amp;oacute;n respecto a Master Data Services , y otro importante recurso es The What, Why, and How of Master Data Management . Una de las novedades que m&amp;aacute;s me llam&amp;oacute;...(&lt;a href="http://geeks.ms/blogs/ozonicco/archive/2009/11/09/160210.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://geeks.ms/aggbug.aspx?PostID=160210" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>